How is 'reasonable force' evaluated according to the factors mentioned in the training?

The concept of 'reasonable force' is assessed using a set of objective factors, which helps ensure that the use of force by an officer is justified and proportional to the situation at hand. This evaluation typically includes considering the severity of the threat posed by the suspect, the immediacy of the danger, the degree of resistance from the suspect, and whether the suspect is actively threatening the officer or others.

This objective approach supports accountability and promotes a standard that is not subjectively determined by individual perceptions. By focusing on measurable elements, it helps officers make informed decisions that are in line with training and policies, taking into account the totality of circumstances they face during an encounter.

Other options suggest a less objective framework. Evaluating force based solely on an officer's discretion could lead to inconsistencies and potential misuse of power, while focusing solely on a suspect's compliance fails to account for varying levels of threat that might necessitate force. Counting witnesses to determine reasonableness does not address the actual circumstances that require the use of force, making it an inadequate measure in evaluating such situations.