Which of the following is not a requirement for a lawful arrest?

The notion of not needing personal knowledge of the arrestee's history for a lawful arrest is grounded in the principles of probable cause and the authority to act as a law enforcement officer. A lawful arrest primarily hinges on having probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the individual being arrested is responsible for that crime. This means that an officer can make an arrest based on observed behavior, available information, and reasonable inference rather than having a detailed prior knowledge of the individual’s criminal history.

The authority to arrest reflects the legal capacity of an officer to make an arrest, which is established by law or agency policy. Intent to arrest is crucial; officers must have a clear intention to bring the individual into custody. However, understanding the historical background of the person being arrested is not a standard prerequisite for an arrest to be deemed lawful. This allows for a proactive response by peace officers to criminal activity without the necessity of personal knowledge of an individual's past.