Which scenario would justify the use of deadly force?

The justification for the use of deadly force is primarily grounded in the necessity to protect oneself or others from imminent danger. In this scenario, when there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury, the use of deadly force is permitted as it is deemed necessary to prevent grave harm. Law enforcement has a duty to protect life, and if there is credible and immediate danger to an individual, whether that be an officer or a civilian, resorting to deadly force may be necessary to neutralize that threat.

In contrast, scenarios such as apprehending a serial thief or responding to verbal threats do not present an immediate threat of serious physical harm, which does not warrant the use of deadly force. Similarly, when suspects flee the scene, unless they pose an immediate threat at that moment, it does not justify such a serious level of response. Thus, the only scenario that aligns with established use-of-force policies and legal standards is the imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury.